Wolves and Sheep

Wolves and Sheep

Share this post

Wolves and Sheep
Wolves and Sheep
Life in Activism: Don't think about what messaging Democrats should use. Think about what messaging you should use.
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Life in Activism

Life in Activism: Don't think about what messaging Democrats should use. Think about what messaging you should use.

You can control what you say, not what others say

Chris Bowers's avatar
Chris Bowers
Mar 25, 2025
∙ Paid
40

Share this post

Wolves and Sheep
Wolves and Sheep
Life in Activism: Don't think about what messaging Democrats should use. Think about what messaging you should use.
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
7
11
Share

silhouette of man and woman sitting on ottoman
Photo by Etienne Boulanger on Unsplash

We have all had these conversations.

"You know what Democrats in Congress should say right now? They should…"

"What if the Democrats started talking more like…"

"I think Democratic leaders should start focusing more on…"

When you are someone who consumes a lot of political news–and I assume you are exactly that sort of person, since you are currently reading a mid-size political Substack like Wolves and Sheep that is almost exclusively advertised via email–it can be tempting to watch great events unfold and imagine what you would do if you were in the shoes of one of the main characters.

What would you say differently right now if you were the leader of the House or Senate Democratic caucus? What kind of messaging would you use if you had a large platform on social media, on Substack, or a major news outlet? How would you go about getting the Democratic message out if you were a senior advisor to a leading member of Congress or major advocacy organization?

I know it is tempting to think about what you would do if you were vastly more prominent and / or powerful, because I often find myself doing the exact same thing in private conversations, or even in discussions that take place exclusively inside my head.

However, the truth is that we should not spend our precious time thinking about what other people should say, or what we would say if we were other people. The reason for this is simple: we will only ever be ourselves, and we cannot control what other people say. In fact, in the case of powerful people, such as high ranking politicians or highly visible pundits, we do not have any way of interacting with them to any significant degree. This means that all the time we spend hypothesizing about what leading Democrats or media figures should say or do is, unfortunately, pretty much wasted time.

Instead of thinking about what "Democrats" should say, you should be thinking about what you will say. There are, after all, many in-person conversations that you participate in but where leading politicians, high powered consultants, and big name national pundits are not involved. There are small platforms, such as your social media accounts, where only you can decide what content is broadcast. There are local political meetings that only you, and a small group of your acquaintances, can speak at. Only you can decide what you will say in the email and text chains which you participate in. This is the sort of messaging that you should be concerned about, and which you should put real thought into, because it is the only messaging that you can really control.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Wolves and Sheep to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Matt Kerbel
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More